27.4 C
Beijing
Wednesday, June 3, 2026

“Labour MP Urges Debate on Prince Andrew in Commons”

Keir Starmer faces calls to permit parliamentary discussions on Prince Andrew. The Government, as stated by Downing Street, has no intention to schedule time for such debates in the Commons. Despite Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle’s acknowledgment that the matter could be debated, he clarified that he lacks the authority to allocate time for discussing the royal family under parliamentary regulations.

Labour MP Clive Lewis urged the Prime Minister to allow parliamentary debate on the issue, highlighting the imbalance of power evident in the government’s reluctance to address urgent questions related to the royal family. Lewis emphasized that elected MPs should have the capacity to hold the monarchy accountable and to inquire about matters such as royal tax privileges and property ownership within the democratic framework.

Recent revelations disclosed that Prince Andrew has resided in Royal Lodge, Windsor, at a nominal rent since 2003. Parliamentary discussions on Andrew’s association with Jeffrey Epstein and his occupancy of the rent-free mansion would require a formal motion, but the Government controls the majority of parliamentary time.

Ministers privately called for Prince Andrew to vacate the Windsor Estate, accusing him of exploiting public resources and tarnishing the monarchy’s reputation. The Commons spending oversight body announced intentions to scrutinize the lease agreements for the mansion, with Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, planning to raise pertinent queries with the Crown Estate and the Treasury.

Number 10 clarified that MPs will not have the opportunity to deliberate on Prince Andrew’s behavior in the House of Commons, as the royal family prefers parliamentary focus on pressing national matters.

Labour peer Lord Foulkes criticized the constraints preventing urgent questions regarding the royal family, highlighting the need for modernizing parliamentary rules to facilitate appropriate scrutiny of the Monarchy and Royal Family by Parliament. As per Erskine May guidelines, criticism of the royal family necessitates inclusion in a substantial motion.

For quick access to valued news content, select Daily Mirror as a ‘Preferred Source’ on Google News.

Latest news
Related news