A potential candidate to lead the investigation into grooming gangs has stepped back, criticizing Kemi Badenoch for politicizing the inquiry and using victims for political gain. This development follows Keir Starmer’s assurance that the investigation will remain thorough despite four survivors exiting the process due to lack of confidence.
Recent turmoil within the Government emerged as four survivors of abuse resigned, expressing doubts about the process. Additionally, a second potential inquiry chair, former police officer Jim Gamble, has also withdrawn, condemning politicians for prioritizing personal or political agendas over the investigation.
During a session of PMQs, Kemi Badenoch highlighted the concerns of survivor Fiona Goddard, questioning the value of speaking out if victims are labeled as dishonest. Notably, Goddard and another survivor, Ellie-Ann Reynolds, resigned from the inquiry’s victims and survivors liaison panel.
Jim Gamble expressed disappointment with the engagement of individuals like Kemi Badenoch in the process, citing the manipulation of victims’ voices for political attacks. He proposed a transparent selection process for the inquiry chair through public interviews in front of a Parliamentary committee.
Gamble urged politicians from all parties to collaborate and move forward constructively, emphasizing the need to avoid using victims as political tools. He stressed the urgency of addressing the issue promptly to prevent future harm to vulnerable individuals affected by grooming gang crimes.